by Fangfallen » Sun Feb 03, 2013 5:28 pm
Ratburntro44 wrote:Wrong, simply nobody has proven (or disproven) it yet. In order for something to be deemed impossible to prove or disprove, it must be proved that it is impossible. Meaning you have failed your question.
by Autumnwolf17 » Sun Feb 03, 2013 5:30 pm
Fangfallen wrote:Ratburntro44 wrote:Wrong, simply nobody has proven (or disproven) it yet. In order for something to be deemed impossible to prove or disprove, it must be proved that it is impossible. Meaning you have failed your question.
Well said, I admit defeat. I can't wait till someone smarter than me solves it though. It's pretty cool
by Fangfallen » Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:09 pm
Autumnwolf17 wrote:Fangfallen wrote:Ratburntro44 wrote:Wrong, simply nobody has proven (or disproven) it yet. In order for something to be deemed impossible to prove or disprove, it must be proved that it is impossible. Meaning you have failed your question.
Well said, I admit defeat. I can't wait till someone smarter than me solves it though. It's pretty cool
Opinion of Fangfallen, increases 50%.
by Autumnwolf17 » Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:01 am
Lopdo wrote:What is the point of making another help thread?
by Fangfallen » Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:30 am
Autumnwolf17 wrote:Lopdo wrote:What is the point of making another help thread?
In an odd way, I think Lopdo just defended one of my threads.
by royalblue » Mon Feb 04, 2013 5:23 am
by Ratburntro44 » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:17 am
royalblue wrote:Question for Fangfallen: What's my name?
by Fangfallen » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:40 am
royalblue wrote:Question for Fangfallen: What's my name?
by >(FM)< » Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:43 am
royalblue wrote:Question for Fangfallen: What's my name?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests
