TO-DO list

[attackbomb]

Filtering isn't sorting the problem.The problem is players acting like children making rude and vulgar game names as guests.I only want to stop this and not real guests who wish to join the game.So its best if they can still make games but can't alter the name.

I don't even read the game names anymore....

Same as you don't read thread names, Lopdo's - To-Do-List.

No offence Callenharnemark but help levels under 10 , i'll await Lopdo's answer.

I agree with highlander on this situation. There are wimps on the internet who hide behind guest accounts. Everyone has seen the offensive and idiotic game names. Justice must be served.

[GivinUDaHimelik]

appoint more in-game mods to help techgump out (no offense tech)

[k999999999]

Here is the list of thing that we plan to implement in (near or far) future. Order of items doesn't mean they will be made in this order

- private games
- whisper in chat
- replays
- tournaments

yeah whisper dont sound so great but everything else perfect

[Fangfallen]

appoint more in-game mods to help techgump out (no offense tech)

Check.

[GivinUDaHimelik]

uh, no offense to u either but neither of u is ever on early in the day...........need some1 who can be on earlier than u guys r

[royalblue]

uh, no offense to u either but neither of u is ever on early in the day...........need some1 who can be on earlier than u guys r

Not you.

[mattie]

uh, no offense to u either but neither of u is ever on early in the day...........need some1 who can be on earlier than u guys r

Not you.

made that clear royal lol

[Fangfallen]

uh, no offense to u either but neither of u is ever on early in the day...........need some1 who can be on earlier than u guys r

True enough, ideally we would have a moderator on always, but that is unlikely as of now.

I don't think we will get any new moderators for quite awhile as it is.

[BillDoorNZ]

I'd suggest that the penalty for Surrendering be increased and reflect the state of the game. The idea is to stop people from quitting for trivial reasons.

Really, it should be based on the number of other players still alive and the relative empire size & strength of the quitter, when compared to the size & strength of the remaining players.

Thus, if someone starts the game, attacks a couple of times and surrenders because they dont get the result they want, their comparative strength to others will be relatively equal and the number of other players will be large, resulting in a sever surrender score (or shard) penalty.

Later in the game, is 1 or 2 empires are large and a small empire quits, its size and strength when compared to the 'largest' empire will be trivial, resulting in much less of a loss.

[Autumnwolf17]

It's already bad enough. A couple of armed men broke into my house today and I had to wait two turns before I could surrender. By then, my family had been shot and the robbers were long gone. I was too late to save my wife and my daughter would have died too if we'd arrived at the hospital a minute later. Can you imagine what would have happened if your system was there?

I'm absolutely kidding, that's a good idea.