Page 2 of 3

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 7:21 am
by Joriom
Exclusion of Liability
IMHO oryginal makes more sense:
[...] materials found or offered on this website for any particular purpose.

Than reworded phrase:
[...]materials found or offered on this web site for any particular role.


3. Language & Behaviour
Thats a perfect fix for that part! If you can't read, read it twice! [/sarcasm]
Submitting a screenshot is a good way to prove your accusation. Fake screenshots edited by Photoshop, Gimp or any other product are easy to figure out. Posting fake screenshots about someone will leave you sanctioned. Screen-shotting use ''ALT+Printscreen'', paste in paint and upload to http://www.imageshack.us is always a good way to do it. Fake screenshots edited by Photoshop, Gimp or any other product are easy to figure out. Posting fake screenshots about someone will leave you sanctioned. Member accusations may be made here: Report Users.

Also I believe the part about screenshooting is a bit messed up.
Screen-shotting use ''ALT+Printscreen'', paste in paint and upload to http://www.imageshack.us is always a good way to do it. do it. do it.

Taking few words away for clarity:
Screenshooting use "PrtScr", paste and upload is a good way to...
Its doubled anyway.

General observaton:
I like giving each rule its code that can be easily adressed. Yet I don't think those A's and B's need dots. Its not N'th rule.
I dont like overusing red, or rather one color. In oryginal verson we had clear division: ToS, & Rules. Red used to be the divisor. Bold, bigger black text divided subsections. I liked that. In the "updated" version we have everything divided by bold, red text with varrying size. Which is harder to notice at first glance.

At the current state I had to vote "No, its not an improvement" as rules list gained readability but overall document lost it and most of the rewordings were hardly noticable, if changed anything at all.

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:33 pm
by Fangfallen
Updated book.

I want to add in a standard etiquette section, basically stating common courtesy. IE: Don't troll, etc.
However, I need a good definition of troll and other such things. Any suggestions?

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:18 pm
by Robomajor
A troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Sun Jun 15, 2014 4:53 am
by Fangfallen
Anybody have any suggestions for the rulebook before it replaces the current?

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:11 pm
by >(FM)<
When did this.
How did.
What.

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:30 pm
by highlander
Fangfallen wrote:Anybody have any suggestions for the rulebook before it replaces the current?


Thread names:
Polls:

Are both liable to bannishment if offensive.

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 10:00 pm
by calleharnemark
highlander wrote:
Fangfallen wrote:Anybody have any suggestions for the rulebook before it replaces the current?


Thread names:
Polls:

Are both liable to bannishment if offensive.

+1.

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2014 11:22 pm
by Fangfallen
Image

So, just an idea - How does that look? (I know, it's not the whole thing.

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 3:33 am
by Happiness
Just fine. And one more thing, maintain consistency of the word "website". Having "web site" in one place, and having "website" in another is a bit odd to most.

Re: Vortex Wars Rulebook put through FangCheck

PostPosted: Wed Jun 18, 2014 3:53 am
by Ratburntro44
Why is this a picture?