Hig wrote:I thought you were female. Your perception of other people, your insight into what makes them tick and your over-sensitive nature made me think you were - and still are - female. Probably about 13 or 14 too.
calleharnemark wrote:Hig wrote:I thought you were female. Your perception of other people, your insight into what makes them tick and your over-sensitive nature made me think you were - and still are - female. Probably about 13 or 14 too.
That's not how you define female ._.
Hig wrote:I thought you were female. Your perception of other people, your insight into what makes them tick and your over-sensitive nature made me think you were - and still are - female. Probably about 13 or 14 too.
Autumnwolf17 wrote:Hig wrote:I thought you were female. Your perception of other people, your insight into what makes them tick and your over-sensitive nature made me think you were - and still are - female. Probably about 13 or 14 too.
Wow. I'm oversensitive?
HOW FREAKING DARE YOU SAY I AM OVERSENSITIVE?!?! YOU DISRESPECTFUL ARSE!!!
*cries silently in the corner*
But seriously, what?
Hig wrote:calleharnemark wrote:Hig wrote:I thought you were female. Your perception of other people, your insight into what makes them tick and your over-sensitive nature made me think you were - and still are - female. Probably about 13 or 14 too.
That's not how you define female ._.
Yes that is how I define female.
Hig wrote:It doesn't matter if you couldn't disagree more.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 172 guests