Fangfallen wrote:I think mine and Autumn's sigs complement eachother nicely

My last one complimented better, but I forgot it now.
Fangfallen wrote:haha social skills... wth did you even recruit me

You recuited yourself really.. but I've liked you from that first day when I told you I was trying to clear the chat to erase my conversation, and so you copied and pasted our Pack values twenty or so times to spam in off... that made me happy.

Fangfallen wrote:How about this for recruiting.
First we must scout for good players.
Ideally they should be over level 10. This allows us to single out players who in all likelihood will continue to play the game.
Yes, I know that rankings can really jump around, but perhaps we should really focus down on those with ranks of over 1500.
Trustworthiness would be a great thing to have in our newbies. A good way to judge that would to have 2 or 3 of our trusted members (lets call them recruiters)
play a few matches with the person we are wanting to recruit. After a few games we can judge whether or not they are secretive allying as well as whether they multi-account.
Skill is hard to see as every game really differs, so we really would need to use our own judgement on that.
Attitude is nice to have in our players as well (good attitude that is) lets keep out the jerks and the stuck up folk who are sore winners as well as sore losers.
As well as those that cuss WAAAYY to much. That's just annoying.
I get the vibe that WP strives for good quality gaming rather than amassing as many people as possible just to make ourselves look better.
Wouldn't it be better to have 10-15 decent players with a good attitude who can take correction and guidance, rather than 50 players who are all butting for an high rank and totally shoving aside their comrades feelings and skill sets?
Good points, I agree with that.